Revenue Recognition as an applied accounting principle has gained significant importance since the roll out of IFRS 15 and ASC 606 principles. This has impacted how businesses recognize their revenues and financial reporting and in turn resulting in a more consistent approach across businesses. Revenue Recognition is typically determined on a contract-by-contract basis in order to capture the nuances of that specific contract and eliminate any linear approach to recognizing revenue.
Revenue recognition is subject to the criteria of multiple deliverable arrangements based on the business needs. Under these criteria, in some scenarios like contract manufacturing or infrastructure development, revenue may not be recognized systematically over the life of a contract; instead, it may be segmented and recognized when certain milestones or deliverables are achieved. To address these challenges, the FASB and IASB introduced a 5 Step Model for Revenue Recognition, offering a framework to drive consistency in financial reporting, facilitate comparative analysis and reporting, and simplify financial statement preparation, thus eliminating disparities.
Introduction
The primary challenges with revenue recognition are timing (when revenue is recorded) and measurement (how much revenue is recognized). Revenue should be recognized when a company transfers control of an asset (either a good or a service) to a customer. Specific challenges include managing changes during the course of the contract, such as bonuses or refunds, and adjusting for miscalculations as accounting standards and interpretations change.
With all of these critical aspects, revenue recognition impacts both reporting and valuation. For example, Uber's first-quarter revenue in 2017 was $3.4 billion under traditional GAAP accounting, but under the new regulations, it would have been $1.5 billion. Therefore, management must be aware of revenue timing variations and their impact on the valuation process.