The collection, analysis, reconciliation, and adjustment of account balances, financial transactions, and data from numerous systems are all necessary steps in the difficult month-end closure process. In order to be confident that the financial statements correctly reflect the financial activity for the month, the method includes a thorough evaluation of the financial activity and performance for the full month as well as accuracy adjustments.
Bottlenecks arise in the financial closure for the following reasons:
- Without automation, the month-end closure procedure resembles a fire drill rather than being carried out throughout the month.
- There are many procedures for various accounts and transactions:
a. Cash accounts, for example, are reconciled.
b. Some accounts, such as open purchase orders and prepaid costs, are examined.
c. Certain transactions, such as intercompany transactions, must be matched.
d. Some transactions just require comparison to what is "typical."
- Poor communication and coordination between the departments involved in the financial closure, ineffective workflow, and limited insight into the closing operations.
- Numerous jobs need time since they are manual, require Excel analysis, and are not part of the ERP. -expensive modifications submitted to the ERP or EPM solution for error correction
- No awareness of upstreaming mistakes or anomalous transactions
- Limitations on capacity weighing precision against labor costs and closing times.
The causes of financial constraints
1.Absence of a clear process:
A Deloitte survey found that institutional memory rather than precise and defined procedure is frequently used to manage the month-close process. Since they have been doing it that way for years, various participants in the process "simply know how things get done."
2.Lack of automation in financial close:
The following ways that financial close software enhances the closing process:
i) Efficiency
ii) Visibility
iii) Timeliness - Due to a key stakeholder being out of the office or persistent delays on regular tasks brought on by competing priorities, tasks are frequently postponed in organizations without automated capabilities.
3. Lack of a well-defined procedure:
Each action in the close process must be assessed for its value and purpose throughout the close process since financial close automation cannot be especially useful without visibility into the bottlenecks impeding the month-close process.
4. Lack of business-wide standardization:
The number of stakeholders and the absence of established processes are two additional significant obstacles to automating record-to-report. The information provided to the finance teams by external teams from other business units sometimes differs substantially. People tend to do things their own way, which poses a problem for procedures that must be consistent throughout all company sectors.
5. Manual preparation of financial statements:
The traditional approach for preparing financial statements requires a lot of "cutting and pasting," incorporating information from several employees, from the previous month&aposs report. It is challenging to keep track of different revisions and adjustments, which makes it challenging to confirm the report&aposs veracity and correctness.
6. The approval process
also uses manual procedures, and in many businesses, executives must approve physical paper copies that are then kept on file for auditing purposes. But the human mistake is common in manual operations. Additionally, every financial statement inaccuracy has a negative effect on a company&aposs trustworthiness.